Is My Personality As Good As I Thought?
In recent years, questions about character have occupied a central role in many academic discussions. Part of this growth can be attributed to the publication of G. K. Chesterton's The Soul of Man Under Socialism, as well as the influential work of Leo Strauss, The Concept of Man in its Historical Development.
Most scholars, however, still debate whether the term character applies to those attributes of a person that are considered to be moral or immoral. Philosophers are divided in their view of what character is, as they consider two distinct kinds of character. There are, on one hand, the virtues, which include such attributes as justice, courage, temperance and so on. On the other hand, there are the vices, which include the likes of ambition, deceit and so on.
In this respect, it is important to bear in mind that human nature itself is not perfect, and that it is possible to have a very good character despite some shortcomings. Indeed, in modern society many people who possess good characteristics have not always possessed them. Therefore, a person may have an idealized character, although it would have been a great challenge for them to act out the ideal with real conviction.
One way to understand good character is to keep in mind that it is more than merely acting the right way or doing the right thing. It can also be seen in an attitude of commitment. An example might be that of a teacher, who refuses to abandon her students even when all efforts to bring about discipline fail.
In his book The Concept of Character, Leo Strauss defines a good character as one that is open and willing to accept criticism. In another context, this could be interpreted as a willingness to examine oneself and to take responsibility for errors. Of course, the same is true in all cases, but one could argue that character should not be equated with self-criticism.
Human nature, it should be remembered, tends toward self-transformation through the self-awareness that character brings. For this reason, it is important to allow people to change their characters as they grow older and become more mature, rather than attempting to impose rigid definitions upon them as if it were a science.
Today's character is no longer a product of our youth. We have changed our outlook on life, and we tend to seek out new experiences. Our capacity for self-criticism has lessened, as we move into the realm of maturity. This, in turn, makes our character more flexible and adaptable.
Being able to change your character is not always a difficult task, provided you are willing to make the effort. But if you are afraid that you will never be able to get over your past, then don't hesitate to take a good look at your character.
Character Development For Children
In writing for children, what makes for a successful story is character development. When writing for adults, the development of the character will be different. It is important to develop the character, but you must also consider the other characters in the story and how they relate to the main character. The main character, the person that the story is about, needs to have flaws, but the secondary characters need to complement the main character in the way they relate to the character.
Synonyms for character development in balance with your character's personality or nature: A character is not always out of line with his personality or nature; rather, he is in perfect harmony with his nature. In harmony with the character or role assumed in the story: An actor in character is not out of line with his nature. If the role in the story is not written as a personality, the character will appear to be out of sync with his personality. This makes for an uneven story.
In character development, character traits are often on either side of the personality/nature spectrum: Two characters could be opposites on some traits; this does not make them incompatible. Character traits that do not work well together often work because they represent two different personalities in a single person, which is more complex than the opposite poles of personality, like good and evil, left and right, and black and white. In contrast, traits that seem incompatible with each other will sometimes complement one another.
Most writers use the same basic concept for character development, but it may vary depending on the writer's needs. For example, most writers use the three C's of characterization (character, conflict, and resolution) and use the same type of character development model. They also use the same type of character development model for writing a story about a character who is not a main character: The problem with this model is that it can lead to inconsistent or unsatisfying endings. The solution is to change the character from being the main character of the story to just another character in the story, but to maintain the overall theme of the story.
The third category of character development is not as common, but very powerful: creating a character that is not a main character but the main character of the story. This model is the basis of most short story. stories, because the central character does not always need to be central to the plot. in such a story is usually a secondary character, such as a child or a character who supports or opposes the main character, but does not make decisions or change the story. This model creates a character who is less central, but, and in the end becomes central to the ending of the story.
Although all three models of character development are important, they are not mutually exclusive. Sometimes, a story might be told entirely about a secondary character who is in the story for a specific reason, so the story cannot be told completely about the main character. Other times, a story may be told entirely about a primary character, so character development can be used in combination with other forms of story telling to create a seamless whole.
The wisdom of insecurity
0 Comments:
Post a Comment